Re: PostgreSQL and Cygwin as production database

Steve Slatcher wrote:
>
> I am not sure how relevant it is to this forum, but because it has come up a

Indeed, I just forgot this is for people who have already decided to
run PostgreSQL on CygWin.

> couple of times.... It is because there *may* be a requirement to run Windows
> apps on the same machine. And because the staff supporting it are more

A machine capable of running GNU/Linux or *BSD is cheap enough, and
MS Windows is bad enough at multiprogramming for one to avoid it
altogether for DBMSs. I see no possible compelling reasons for
denying PostgreSQL a POSIX OS.

> the background for my question. My current feeling is that there probably
> *are* better solutions than Cygwin/PostrgreSQL.

If you're really married to MS Windows, I think Interbase and
Firebird have w32 native versions. You may want to check if SAPdb
also do.

--
_
/ \ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 216 15 93
\ / http://homepage.mac.com./leandrod/ fax +41 (21) 216 19 04
X http://tutoriald.sf.net./ Orange Communications CH
/ \ Campanha fita ASCII, contra correio HTML +41 (21) 648 11 34