Re: geo_decls.h oopsie...

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: geo_decls.h oopsie...
Date: 2002-02-14 20:21:59
Message-ID: 3C6C1C67.9A45413B@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> > But to compare floating point, those are simply wrong.
> See previous discussions concerning the quality of the builtin geometric
> types. Not clear that it's worth worrying about, unless you want to go
> in for a wholesale overhaul. My own opinion is that PostGIS will
> supersede the need for these types...

Oops. I think that we will welcome any updates and fixes to any of the
built in features of PostgreSQL, no matter our individual opinions of
the usefulness of a particular feature (right??). In this case, the
return value patches would seem to be important and the second topic
should be addressed also.

- Thomas

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dann Corbit 2002-02-14 20:32:15 Re: geo_decls.h oopsie...
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 2002-02-14 20:17:13 Re: FWD: overlaps() bug?