Re: dynamic-static date once again

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tomasz Myrta <jasiek(at)lamer(dot)pl>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: dynamic-static date once again
Date: 2001-09-17 06:26:31
Message-ID: 3BA59797.7E1B570@fourpalms.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

...
> I think we have agreed that 'current' is a Bad Idea and should be
> eliminated from the date/time datatypes...

I've started purging it from the timestamp code I'm working on for 7.2.
Should be gone by the start of beta...

- Thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-09-17 06:33:07 Re: Bug #443: Problem with time functions.
Previous Message John Summerfield 2001-09-17 04:23:34 Re: SQLCODE==-209

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2001-09-17 06:28:51 Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: [tao-users] FW: HEADS UP: CVSup timestamp bug]]
Previous Message Rums Dabs 2001-09-17 06:01:16 CD-RW Scheduled Database Backup...