| From: | David Ford <david(at)blue-labs(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Serguei Mokhov <sa_mokho(at)alcor(dot)concordia(dot)ca>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: List response time... |
| Date: | 2001-08-24 06:18:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3B85F1BB.9060509@blue-labs.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>Both qmail and postfix radically outperform sendmail for large mailing
>list delivery on identical hardware. It seems strange to me to say
>that there is no sendmail issue when sendmail itself is the issue.
>The queuing structure sendmail uses is simply wrong when a single
>message has many recipients. I've run moderately serious (1000 users,
>dozens of messages per day) mailing lists using both sendmail and
>qmail, and there really is no comparison.
>
Ian, please
It's in the configuration. I run much more than the above and have no
issues at all.
-d
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | speedboy | 2001-08-24 07:57:44 | Re: Re: List response time... |
| Previous Message | David Ford | 2001-08-24 06:13:52 | Re: Re: List response time... |