Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > > If there's no objection, I would change the current
> > > > source in a week or so.
> > >
> > > This seems like something to do during 7.2 development, not as part
> > > of post-7.1 bug fixing.
> > >
> > I can wait to commit it if the 7.2 branch is near
> > but have a basic question.
> > What does 7.2 development mean for clients(psqlodbc) ?
> You can issue your own releases of ODBC while 7.2 is still being
> developed. For ODBC, the split really just means that 7.1.X users don't
> get the changes unless you backpatch 7.1.X after the split.
As far as I see, few people need the backpatch.
Under Windows most people use the binary distribu-
Under unix I wonder how many people use our driver.
Recently I've searched the use of our ODBC driver
with iODBC a little but I was able to find the word
neither *successful* nor *solved*. Is the driver
really supposed to be available with iODBC ? How
about giving up iODBC support ?
In response to
pgsql-odbc by date
|Next:||From: Andrea Aime||Date: 2001-04-24 06:34:40|
|Subject: Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc|
|Previous:||From: Jean-Michel POURE||Date: 2001-04-24 04:50:56|
|Subject: Re: Re: Access 2000 - ADO|