From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc |
Date: | 2001-04-24 05:18:45 |
Message-ID: | 3AE50CB5.343B54C7@tpf.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-odbc |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >
> > > Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > > If there's no objection, I would change the current
> > > > source in a week or so.
> > >
> > > This seems like something to do during 7.2 development, not as part
> > > of post-7.1 bug fixing.
> > >
> > I can wait to commit it if the 7.2 branch is near
> > but have a basic question.
> >
> > What does 7.2 development mean for clients(psqlodbc) ?
>
> You can issue your own releases of ODBC while 7.2 is still being
> developed. For ODBC, the split really just means that 7.1.X users don't
> get the changes unless you backpatch 7.1.X after the split.
>
As far as I see, few people need the backpatch.
Under Windows most people use the binary distribu-
tion.
Under unix I wonder how many people use our driver.
Recently I've searched the use of our ODBC driver
with iODBC a little but I was able to find the word
neither *successful* nor *solved*. Is the driver
really supposed to be available with iODBC ? How
about giving up iODBC support ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrea Aime | 2001-04-24 06:34:40 | Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc |
Previous Message | Jean-Michel POURE | 2001-04-24 04:50:56 | Re: Re: Access 2000 - ADO |