Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc
Date: 2001-04-24 04:44:51
Message-ID: 200104240444.f3O4ipE14986@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc

> Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > > If there's no objection, I would change the current
> > > source in a week or so.
> >
> > This seems like something to do during 7.2 development, not as part
> > of post-7.1 bug fixing.
> >
> I can wait to commit it if the 7.2 branch is near
> but have a basic question.
>
> What does 7.2 development mean for clients(psqlodbc) ?

You can issue your own releases of ODBC while 7.2 is still being
developed. For ODBC, the split really just means that 7.1.X users don't
get the changes unless you backpatch 7.1.X after the split.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2001-04-24 04:50:56 Re: Re: Access 2000 - ADO
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 2001-04-24 04:15:26 Re: A proposal to change psqlodbc