Re: Sluggish inserts/updates ?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sluggish inserts/updates ?
Date: 2001-02-07 22:27:32
Message-ID: 3A81CBD4.E444FF8D@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adam Haberlach wrote:
>
> I've got a system in which a row is being created by one process,
> a notify is sent, and another process finds and then deletes the
> row. This whole interchange seems to be taking about a second, which
> seems oddly slow.

If you do it enough times without vacuum, the table grows quite big,
even
though it may look empty...

> As far as I know, I have the fsync-on-anything
> turned off (*).
>
> I'm mainly wondering if I should index/not index the key of the
> table, and if I should blame the hardware or Postgres?

Index would very likely help. (BTW, the best way to find out is to try
it -
you can always drop it later ;)

> The hard
> drive on the R&D server is pretty slow, although the CPU is pretty
> dang fast. I could also blame the notification system but that
> shouldn't be a problem, right?

How do you read the notify ?

----------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kovacs Zoltan 2001-02-07 22:46:17 pg_dump: oldie but goldie
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2001-02-07 22:27:00 Re: pg_ctl changes