| From: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Sluggish inserts/updates ? |
| Date: | 2001-02-07 19:27:55 |
| Message-ID: | 20010207112755.A30850@newsnipple.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I've got a system in which a row is being created by one process,
a notify is sent, and another process finds and then deletes the
row. This whole interchange seems to be taking about a second, which
seems oddly slow. As far as I know, I have the fsync-on-anything
turned off (*).
I'm mainly wondering if I should index/not index the key of the
table, and if I should blame the hardware or Postgres? The hard
drive on the R&D server is pretty slow, although the CPU is pretty
dang fast. I could also blame the notification system but that
shouldn't be a problem, right?
* Is there a good way to find out if this option is on/off?
--
Adam Haberlach |A cat spends her life conflicted between a
adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com |deep, passionate, and profound desire for
http://www.newsnipple.com |fish and an equally deep, passionate, and
'88 EX500 '00 >^< |profound desire to avoid getting wet.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-07 19:50:04 | Re: pgAccess fails to launch on HPUX |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-02-07 19:20:16 | Re: pgAccess fails to launch on HPUX |