| From: | M(dot)Feldtmann(at)t-online(dot)de (Marten Feldtmann) |
|---|---|
| To: | David Wall <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: MySQL has transactions |
| Date: | 2001-01-24 16:47:03 |
| Message-ID: | 3A6F0707.CCFAC8C1@toppoint.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
David Wall schrieb:
>
> Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's
> always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql has
> over it? I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add a
> master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization (perhaps
> locks tables like vacuum?).
>
> Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment?
>
> Thanks,
> David
Another question: now the sap-db is open and the source will be
released
this years, what is the advantage of MySQL over SPA-DB ?
Marten
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Wall | 2001-01-24 16:51:51 | Re: MySQL has transactions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-01-24 16:46:33 | Re: Help me please!! -newbie- |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2001-01-24 16:47:20 | Re: Libpq async issues |
| Previous Message | Ross J. Reedstrom | 2001-01-24 16:43:40 | Re: [PATCHES] PgAccess schema-diagram cleanup |