From: | "Adam Lang" <aalang(at)rutgersinsurance(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: MySQL has transactions |
Date: | 2001-01-24 18:59:51 |
Message-ID: | 020a01c08637$d4d31360$330a0a0a@6014cwpza006 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
You should probably ask the MySQL people that.
Adam Lang
Systems Engineer
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
http://www.rutgersinsurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marten Feldtmann" <M(dot)Feldtmann(at)t-online(dot)de>
To: "David Wall" <d(dot)wall(at)computer(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2001 11:47 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] MySQL has transactions
>
>
> David Wall schrieb:
> >
> > Now that MySQL has transaction support through Berkeley DB lib, and it's
> > always had way more data types, what are the main advantages postgresql
has
> > over it? I don't think mysql has subselects and such, but they did add
a
> > master-slave replication feature as well as online reorganization
(perhaps
> > locks tables like vacuum?).
> >
> > Anybody used both of the current releases who can comment?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > David
>
> Another question: now the sap-db is open and the source will be
> released
> this years, what is the advantage of MySQL over SPA-DB ?
>
> Marten
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2001-01-24 19:07:38 | Re: LO to text conversion |
Previous Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2001-01-24 18:59:24 | Re: MySQL has transactions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephan Szabo | 2001-01-24 19:01:14 | Re: Strange.. solved |
Previous Message | Brett W. McCoy | 2001-01-24 18:57:19 | Re: MySQL has transactions |