From: | Joseph Shraibman <jks(at)selectacast(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Steve Wolfe <steve(at)iboats(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: how good is PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2000-11-02 19:14:16 |
Message-ID: | 3A01BD08.5141A849@selectacast.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Performance depends on a lot of factors. Shelling out $$$ for Sun
hardware doesn't garuntee good performance. They might have been better
off buying a Tru64 system with Compaq's jdk.
Steve Wolfe wrote:
>
> > d) PHP may not be a great choice. It doesn't provide a lot of hooks
> > for effective caching of database connections and/or results.
> > mod_perl or Java servlets may be better, depending on the details.
>
> One of our competitors spent a very, very large deal of money on high-end
> Sun equipment, so that they could write their CGI stuff in Java servlets.
> It still ran slow. We run Perl on machines that pale compared to theirs,
> and get far better performance. : )
>
> steve
--
Joseph Shraibman
jks(at)selectacast(dot)net
Increase signal to noise ratio. http://www.targabot.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-11-02 19:22:19 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |
Previous Message | Nathan Suderman | 2000-11-02 19:05:41 | the List! the List |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2000-11-02 19:14:36 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-02 18:56:29 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] Query caching |