Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL still for Linux only?
Date: 2005-03-11 14:48:34
Message-ID: 39dpe2F611dajU2@individual.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

That remains to be seen.

I wouldn't consider it the least bit worthwhile to try to evaluate it
now, as what is happening now is that "WinFolk" are getting their very
first exposure to the software.

It would seem surprising for new developers to emerge from the
Windows(tm) population before at least 6 months have passed.

The way developers emerge is that users come along, work with the
software for a while, and discover things that "itch" them the wrong
way. They have become sufficiently committed that it is worth putting
a little effort into scratching some of the itches. That starts
getting them into understanding the code a little better, allowing
them to subsequently scratch deeper itches.
--
output = reverse("moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/nonrdbms.html
Share and Enjoy!!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Doug Bloebaum 2005-03-11 14:48:38 Oracle's Virtual Private Database functionality
Previous Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-03-11 14:48:30 Re: row numbering