Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)

From: Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Date: 2000-10-31 16:28:26
Message-ID: 39FEF32A.AD89D766@alert.infoplease.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports

Lamar Owen wrote:

> As to why the package is split, well, it is highly useful to many people
> to have a PostgreSQL _client_ installation that accesses a central
> database server -- there is no need to have a postmaster and a full
> backend when all you need is psql and the libraries and documentation
> that goes along with psql.

My personal experience is that the way the PostgreSQL RPMs are split is very good. It meshes nicely with other dependencies so that I don't need to install extra RPMs on our servers. I for one would not like to see that change.

--
Karl DeBisschop kdebisschop(at)alert(dot)infoplease(dot)com
Learning Network Reference http://www.infoplease.com
Netsaint Plugin Developer kdebisschop(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-10-31 16:29:20 PostgreSQL 7.0.2-21 RPMset available.
Previous Message Craig N. Caroon 2000-10-31 16:07:31 Converting to PostgresQL and have some questions.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2000-10-31 16:29:20 PostgreSQL 7.0.2-21 RPMset available.
Previous Message Luis Magaa 2000-10-31 16:14:21 Re: Data definition for aclitem Datatype

Browse pgsql-ports by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Ribe 2000-10-31 16:34:41 pgsql on Mac OS X?
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-10-31 15:51:09 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)