| From: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-21 04:45:01 |
| Message-ID: | 3950484D.417C87E9@nimrod.itg.telecom.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Some unhappiness was raised about
> > > depending on symlinks for this function, but I didn't hear one single
> > > concrete reason not to do it, nor an alternative design.
> >
> > Are symlinks portable?
>
> Sure, and if the system loading it can not create the required symlinks
> because the directories don't exist, it can just skip the symlink step.
What I meant is, would you still be able to create tablespaces on
systems without symlinks? That would seem to be a desirable feature.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-21 04:55:01 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-21 04:33:01 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2000-06-21 04:55:01 | RE: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-21 04:33:01 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |