| From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Bitmead <chrisb(at)nimrod(dot)itg(dot)telstra(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Date: | 2000-06-21 03:46:23 |
| Message-ID: | 200006210346.XAA15138@candle.pha.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Some unhappiness was raised about
> > depending on symlinks for this function, but I didn't hear one single
> > concrete reason not to do it, nor an alternative design.
>
> Are symlinks portable?
Sure, and if the system loading it can not create the required symlinks
because the directories don't exist, it can just skip the symlink step.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-21 04:06:42 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-21 03:45:13 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-06-21 04:06:42 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-21 03:45:13 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |