Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Date: 2000-06-17 00:50:10
Message-ID: 394ACB42.C87C59B8@bitmead.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
So
> the thing would act a lot like the original-relname-plus-OID variant
> that's been discussed so far. (Original relname because ALTER TABLE
> RENAME would *not* change the physical file name. But we could
> think about a form of VACUUM that creates a whole new table by
> versioning, and that would presumably bring the physical name back
> in sync with the logical relname.)

At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in
pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the
vacuum method.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-06-17 01:12:29 Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-06-17 00:41:30 Re: Mandrake RPMS, was "Building PostgreSQL 7.0.1 documentation"