From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: OK, OK, Hiroshi's right: use a seperately-generated filename |
Date: | 2000-06-18 23:01:12 |
Message-ID: | 200006182301.TAA18988@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Tom Lane wrote:
> So
> > the thing would act a lot like the original-relname-plus-OID variant
> > that's been discussed so far. (Original relname because ALTER TABLE
> > RENAME would *not* change the physical file name. But we could
> > think about a form of VACUUM that creates a whole new table by
> > versioning, and that would presumably bring the physical name back
> > in sync with the logical relname.)
>
> At least on UNIX, couldn't you use a hard-link and change the name in
> pg_class immediately? Let the brain-dead operating systems use the
> vacuum method.
Yes, we can hard-link, and let vacuum remove the old link.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-18 23:36:59 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-06-18 22:50:17 | Re: Big 7.1 open items |