Re: Postgresql usage clip.

From: Ron Chmara <ron(at)Opus1(dot)COM>
To: "Brett W(dot) McCoy" <bmccoy(at)chapelperilous(dot)net>
Cc: Lincoln Yeoh <lylyeoh(at)mecomb(dot)com>, Erich <hh(at)cyberpass(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql usage clip.
Date: 2000-05-30 03:02:40
Message-ID: 39332F50.1F553D67@opus1.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Brett W. McCoy" wrote:
> MySQL is great for small websites with small budgets with read-only data
> or data that doesn't change often. It doesn't scale very well at all, and
> for larger sites it really falls apart without anyy referential integrity
> or supprto for views. But beyond that, you really need something bigger
> like Postgres (for a big site with a small budget) or Oracle (for a huge
> site with a huger budget).

Have a db comparison toy. Lots of fun.

http://mysql.com/crash-me-choose.htmy

-Bop

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-30 03:22:07 Re: lots of large objects and toast
Previous Message Brett W. McCoy 2000-05-30 03:01:26 Re: Postgresql usage clip.