Re: AW: AW: SQL3 UNDER

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>
To: Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>
Cc: "'Robert B(dot) Easter'" <reaster(at)comptechnews(dot)com>, "'Chris Bitmead'" <chris(at)bitmead(dot)com>, "'Postgres Hackers List'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: AW: SQL3 UNDER
Date: 2000-05-25 10:04:34
Message-ID: 392CFAB2.DEA9F587@tm.ee
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Zeugswetter Andreas SB wrote:
>
> > > When calling functions with a class argument they do pass
> > all attributes
> > > of subclasses to it. They use late function binding, so you
> > can define
> > > different functions for different subclasses having the same name.
> > > They only show parent columns when doing 'select * from
> > class' that has
> > > subclasses.
> >
> > That's what we are planning also, to return all columns current
> > favourite syntax to use is 'select ** from class', but even it is not
> > yet implemented.
>
> I am not talking about select * I am talking about
> "select somefunc(supertable) from supertable"
>
> create table supertable (a int);
> create table taba (b int) under supertable;
>
> create function somefunc (tup supertable) returning int
> as 'select 1' ...
>
> create function somefunc (tup taba) returning int
> as 'select 0.5*b' ....

So how does this work in Informix/Illustra ?

i.e. is the binding done at row evaluation time or
"when they do 'select * ...' and don't know about coumn b"

> >
> > BTW, does Informix/Illustra do single or multiple inheritance
> > with their
> > UNDER?
>
> Multiple,

That's what I thought ;)

> as I said they took Illustra (which was a parallel effort
> to port Postgres to SQL).

That much I know (we almost bought an Illustra db before Postgres95
was even available;)

----------
Hannu

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zeugswetter Andreas SB 2000-05-25 10:12:49 AW: AW: Postgresql OO Patch
Previous Message Karel Zak 2000-05-25 10:03:55 Re: understanding Datum -> char * -> Datum conversions