Re: plpgsql execute vs. SELECT ... INTO

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> The comment on the commit says:

> EXECUTE of a SELECT ... INTO now draws a 'not implemented' error,
> rather than executing the INTO clause with non-plpgsql semantics
> as it was doing for the last few weeks/months. This keeps our options
> open for making it do the right plpgsql-ish thing in future without
> creating a backwards compatibility problem. There is no loss of
> functionality since people can get the same behavior with CREATE TABLE AS.

> Do we really still need to keep out options open on this after all that
> time?

I think it's still a good idea that it won't do something that is very
much different from what a non-EXECUTE'd SELECT INTO will do.

I forget, is there a HINT there suggesting CREATE TABLE AS? Maybe we
should add one if not.

regards, tom lane