Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, peter(at)retep(dot)org(dot)uk
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 05:15:50
Message-ID: 390E6486.5510BB1A@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> otoh, how close are you Peter (hope you see this; I've blown away
> enough email to have lost your address) to posting a built jar file or
> whatever is usually provided? Should we post this somewhere on
> postgresql.org to help out? Should I post my recently built stuff?

Ah, found Peter's e-mail address in an obvious place (the jdbc source
tree).

Another question for Peter: would it be possible to update the README
file in the source tree, and other ancillary files? I know you've been
very busy, but even a brief fixup to adjust dates and version numbers
would be helpful for 7.0.

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Malcontent 2000-05-02 05:22:09 Re: Case insensitive collation.
Previous Message Joachim Achtzehnter 2000-05-02 04:50:22 Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Mount 2000-05-02 07:51:38 RE: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Joachim Achtzehnter 2000-05-02 04:50:22 Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status