Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Date: 2000-05-02 03:26:36
Message-ID: 390E4AEC.797BD3BB@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> If so, I need them (Java 1 and 2) for the RPM's. I don't do Java -- and
> the RPM's have historically packaged the .jar files as pulled verbatim
> from retep.org.uk. I haven't distributed RC2 RPM's yet for partially
> that reason

"I don't do Java" can change fairly easily; just pick up the java
tarball from blackdown.org or sun.com, untar it into /usr/local, then
set your path via

set path=(/usr/local/jdk-xxx $path)

Go into src/interfaces/jdbc and type

make jdbc2

then grab the jar file(s).

otoh, how close are you Peter (hope you see this; I've blown away
enough email to have lost your address) to posting a built jar file or
whatever is usually provided? Should we post this somewhere on
postgresql.org to help out? Should I post my recently built stuff?

> NOTE:
> I have gotten good response and patches to the RPM's from a number of
> people this go around -- and it is ENCOURAGING!

Great!

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-05-02 04:34:51 Re: psql \l error
Previous Message SAKAIDA 2000-05-02 02:47:21 psql \l error

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joachim Achtzehnter 2000-05-02 04:50:22 Re: Request for 7.0 JDBC status
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2000-05-02 02:35:37 Re: [HACKERS] Request for 7.0 JDBC status