Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?
Date: 2010-05-26 03:03:34
Message-ID: 3908.1274843014@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items

> The proposal by Joe Conway is adding a new contib module.
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B959D7A.6010907@joeconway.com
> http://github.com/jconway/pg_controldata

> Should we add the module to 9.0?

No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration,
let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not
get into either core or contrib this time around.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-05-26 03:04:46 Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2010-05-26 02:44:23 Re: Exposing the Xact commit order to the user