Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: chaodhib(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes
Date: 2021-01-18 20:39:02
Message-ID: 390005.1611002342@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

PG Doc comments form <noreply(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> I think the documentation should mention one particular aspect of b-tree
> partial indexes:
> Say we have a row that satisfy a partial index's predicate. That row will be
> referenced by the partial index. Say now that this row gets updated in such
> a way that the updated row no longer satisfies the predicate. The entry of
> that row in the index (more precisely, the row previous version) is still
> kept in a leaf node of the b-tree until a VACUUM is issued on the index's
> table.

How is this different from the behavior for any other dead row version?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jürgen Purtz 2021-01-19 06:37:25 Re: Additional Chapter for Tutorial - arch-dev.sgml
Previous Message PG Doc comments form 2021-01-18 17:07:42 the doc should mention one particular aspect of partial indexes