Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95

From: Wim Ceulemans <wim(dot)ceulemans(at)nice(dot)be>
To: Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
Cc: Ron Chmara <ron(at)opus1(dot)com>, Marten Feldtmann <marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de>, Elmar(dot)Haneke(at)gmx(dot)de, pgsql-general(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95
Date: 2000-02-25 10:08:37
Message-ID: 38B654A5.98F99405@nice.be
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dustin Sallings wrote:
>
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, root wrote:
>
> # > I'm writing this email to you from a notebook. Running Linux. And Postgres.
> # > :-) So, it's already being done (Notebooks aren't the issue here, I believe
> # > it's an issue of OS choices).
> #
> # There're still some Windows'95 and Windows'98 users out there in the
> # world ...
>
> I'm not convinced that this is a reason to run a database server
> on it. I don't think anyone would complain if someone ported postgres to
> Windows, but it seems like a silly exercise. I've got a few macs around
> the house, but I'm in no way interested in using them as data servers.
>

Unless you want to store for example your contacts in an RDBMS on your
personal computer, instead of using MS-Outlook that uses an inefficient
storage format and no integrity checks.

You would in this case use the database server always just to service 1
client program.

Regards
Wim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas de Konink 2000-02-25 11:41:14 HELP ! I'm a newbie looking for examples
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 2000-02-25 10:00:40 Re: [GENERAL] Re: [General] pgsql on win95