| From: | Jose Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT |
| Date: | 2000-02-01 13:19:05 |
| Message-ID: | 3896DD49.26143978@sferacarta.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Don Baccus wrote:
> At 09:41 AM 1/31/00 +0100, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Of course, removing END/ABORT will touch many applications
> > using transactions, but I would vote for it anyway, since
> > it's standard.
>
> Does it make all that much sense to worry about the actual word
> used when the need to use "begin" is non-standard to begin with?
There is no explicit "BEGIN WORK" on SQL92, transaction initiation
is always implicit and it terminates either with a COMMIT or a
ROLLBACK
statement.
>
>
> Of course, removing that would REALLY impact current applications...
>
> - Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
> Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
> Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
> http://donb.photo.net.
>
> ************
--
Jose' Soares
Bologna, Italy Jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-02-01 13:47:43 | Re: [HACKERS] Problem in current CVS |
| Previous Message | Chris | 2000-02-01 12:14:33 | Problem in current CVS |