| From: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jose Soares <jose(at)sferacarta(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT |
| Date: | 2000-02-01 16:03:44 |
| Message-ID: | 3.0.1.32.20000201080344.0106e030@mail.pacifier.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
At 02:19 PM 2/1/00 +0100, Jose Soares wrote:
>
>
>Don Baccus wrote:
>> Does it make all that much sense to worry about the actual word
>> used when the need to use "begin" is non-standard to begin with?
>
> There is no explicit "BEGIN WORK" on SQL92, transaction initiation
> is always implicit and it terminates either with a COMMIT or a
>ROLLBACK
> statement.
That was my point, of course...
- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at
http://donb.photo.net.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2000-02-01 16:07:05 | Re: [HACKERS] PCLabs Survey, Part V: Programmability |
| Previous Message | Mitch Vincent | 2000-02-01 15:58:50 | Re: [HACKERS] plpgsql problem.. |