Re: [HACKERS] Docs

From: Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com>
To: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Docs
Date: 2000-01-03 18:20:14
Message-ID: 3870E85E.685D1E0C@austin.rr.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > > > Another question... how do people normally edit the docs? Is there an sgml
> > > > editor that I can use, or should I do it in some other format, and have it
> > > > converted, or what?
> > > As Vince mentioned, xemacs is the first choice.
> > Now, don't go startin' no feud here... if you need a space shuttle, xemacs is
> > it. But if you need the One True Editor, well, of course...it's vi/vim. :)
>
> Michael wasn't asking for a space shuttle, but he *was* asking for "an
> sgml editor", which implied to me an editor with some knowledge of
> sgml notation. afaik The AntiEditor is the only freeware tool to do
> this...

Vim understands sgml notation to the extent of syntax highlighting.

http://relay.nuxi.com/vim/lang.html

I don't know what xemacs does for sgml.

It appears my attempt at a little late night humor was lost. Please pardon any
offense; it was unintended.

Cheers,
Ed Loehr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-01-03 18:25:06 Index toasting (was: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc")
Previous Message Lamar Owen 2000-01-03 16:51:39 Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated.