From: | Ed Loehr <eloehr(at)austin(dot)rr(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
Cc: | "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Docs |
Date: | 2000-01-03 18:20:14 |
Message-ID: | 3870E85E.685D1E0C@austin.rr.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > > Another question... how do people normally edit the docs? Is there an sgml
> > > > editor that I can use, or should I do it in some other format, and have it
> > > > converted, or what?
> > > As Vince mentioned, xemacs is the first choice.
> > Now, don't go startin' no feud here... if you need a space shuttle, xemacs is
> > it. But if you need the One True Editor, well, of course...it's vi/vim. :)
>
> Michael wasn't asking for a space shuttle, but he *was* asking for "an
> sgml editor", which implied to me an editor with some knowledge of
> sgml notation. afaik The AntiEditor is the only freeware tool to do
> this...
Vim understands sgml notation to the extent of syntax highlighting.
http://relay.nuxi.com/vim/lang.html
I don't know what xemacs does for sgml.
It appears my attempt at a little late night humor was lost. Please pardon any
offense; it was unintended.
Cheers,
Ed Loehr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2000-01-03 18:25:06 | Index toasting (was: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc") |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2000-01-03 16:51:39 | Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. |