Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Date: 1999-12-01 10:28:36
Message-ID: 3844F854.3DF03CFF@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>
> > Why don't remove this call from improper places?
> > I would try to find all calls and understand why
> > they made...
> >
>
> I think UnlockRelation() is unnecessary
>
> Oracle doesn't have

And we havn't UNLOCK TABLE _command_ as well -:)
But func call is internal thing and I don't know
Oracle internals.
If this call is unnecessary - get rid of it at all...

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-12-01 10:37:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-12-01 10:11:25 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hiroshi Inoue 1999-12-01 10:37:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous Message Zeugswetter Andreas SEV 1999-12-01 10:20:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions