| From: | Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| Date: | 1999-12-01 10:11:25 |
| Message-ID: | 3844F44D.4D003E93@tpf.co.jp |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Vadim Mikheev wrote:
> Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> >
> > > I propose here that we stop the release of lock before end of transaction.
> > > I have been suffering from the early release of lock.
> > >
> > > Comments ?
> >
> > If there's no objection,I would change UnlockRelation() to not release
> > the specified lock except AccessShareLock.
>
> Why don't remove this call from improper places?
> I would try to find all calls and understand why
> they made...
>
I think UnlockRelation() is unnecessary
Oracle doesn't have
>
> Vadim
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-12-01 10:28:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-12-01 09:59:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas SEV | 1999-12-01 10:20:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
| Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-12-01 09:59:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |