Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type

From: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Date: 1999-11-30 06:23:05
Message-ID: 38436D49.16D5580F@albourne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I can integrate the type for you into the include/catalog files if
> > > everyone agrees they want it as a standard type and not an contrib type.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Attached are the C-routines that implement a BIT and BIT VARYING type.
> > I know Bruce said he would integrate them, but he is writing a book at
> > the moment as well, so if somebody can explain to me how to go about
> > integrating it, or would like to have a go, go ahead.
>
> Applied. I am embarrassed to say I had a copy from June still in my
> mailbox.

Don't be: they've been ready for a while, but I had to recheck them.
When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do
something about regression tests?

Adriaan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriaan Joubert 1999-11-30 06:30:42 Re: [GENERAL] Table corruption and other questions
Previous Message Bradford Hovinen 1999-11-30 04:49:16 SQL error in PostgreSQL 6.5.3

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-11-30 06:33:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Previous Message Christof Petig 1999-11-30 04:44:10 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS