Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Adriaan Joubert <a(dot)joubert(at)albourne(dot)com>
Cc: Postgresql <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Date: 1999-11-30 06:33:48
Message-ID: 199911300633.BAA11308@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> > Applied. I am embarrassed to say I had a copy from June still in my
> > mailbox.
>
> Don't be: they've been ready for a while, but I had to recheck them.
> When BIT and BIT VARYING are properly integrated, do I need to do
> something about regression tests?

Yes, we will need them to be added to the regression tests. We can use
your test/ directory as a source for that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jesse Scott 1999-11-30 08:32:53 Sorting a table...
Previous Message Adriaan Joubert 1999-11-30 06:30:42 Re: [GENERAL] Table corruption and other questions

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-11-30 06:40:19 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type
Previous Message Adriaan Joubert 1999-11-30 06:23:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type