Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert
Date: 1999-11-29 08:21:09
Message-ID: 38423775.2055DF8A@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I'd not object if we removed these operators and instead provided
> functions with the standard names log() and exp() for all the
> non-integral numeric types. Comments?

I have no great fondness for ";" and ":" as operators, but would like
to see some operators assigned to these functions. Certainly the carat
"^" could work for exp() (or maybe "**" to make those old Fortran
programmers feel better about themselves ;), and perhaps "!^" for
log()? Any other ideas for appropriate symbols for these operators??

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message S S Mani 1999-11-29 09:41:58 Pro*C conversion
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-11-29 08:10:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions