Re: PROXY protocol support

From: Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: "ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp" <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, "magnus(at)hagander(dot)net" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PROXY protocol support
Date: 2021-03-04 19:45:37
Message-ID: 37ff46ce14c4f80f3b645b4bbaf186bf984cab12.camel@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 2021-03-04 at 10:42 +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Is there any formal specification for the "a protocol common and very
> light weight in proxies"?

See

https://www.haproxy.org/download/1.8/doc/proxy-protocol.txt

which is maintained by HAProxy Technologies.

--Jacob

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-03-04 19:48:37 Re: [HACKERS] PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2021-03-04 19:33:05 Re: CI/windows docker vs "am a service" autodetection on windows