Re: "Claimed" status on Commitfest pages

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: "Claimed" status on Commitfest pages
Date: 2008-05-10 05:57:30
Message-ID: 37ed240d0805092257j76c78b9en5eafecdc4e76884d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I see that Brendan has proposed the following definition on
> CommitFest:Help:
>

I wouldn't say I did anything so formal as proposing a definition =)

Someone mentioned that a column to indicate who's handling each patch
would be nice, so I added it. The comments in :Help were really just
an example to explain how you might use the feature.

I'm not looking to formulate commitfest procedure here (I don't have
quite that level of hubris), just providing some tools to get the job
done more comfortably.

> I'm not too pleased with this because it suggests that "reviewing" is
> something only one person can do at a time. What I'd like to see is
> guidelines more along these lines:
>

By all means, go ahead and make these changes. I think your version
makes a lot of sense.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2008-05-10 08:16:56 Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-05-10 05:14:35 Re: Setting a pre-existing index as a primary key