| From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 02:02:37 |
| Message-ID: | 37ed240d0804091902ye3d8f49x378668d3d2aebcd0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Bruce Momjian
wrote:
> I think there is concern that trivial patches wouldn't be submitted to a
> patch tracker, especially by new submitters. Again, I am willing to
> track the ones that aren't in the patch tracker, but then we have two
> places where patches exist (perhaps three with the wiki).
For new submitters, there's always going to be some set of hoops to
jump through. Whether it's emailing -patches, adding a ticket to a
Trac or bugzilla, or adding a wiki entry, there will be some process
that they need to conform to if they want their patch to get reviewed.
Personally I don't feel that using a patch tracker or wiki is any more
onerous than using an email list, and it's a whole lot more responsive
(i.e., doesn't require Bruce to personally and manually shift the
entry from -patches to the queue).
It's not like we'd be asking submitters to draw a chalk circle on
their floor and conduct an arcane ritual. =) It's just a website.
Cheers,
BJ
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFH/XU55YBsbHkuyV0RAg5DAJ9faAwOxlGPGmqkroHLjwkDpE0lWwCfcMrH
dDHcBjpQy5uspFljnv463/k=
=1Tuq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-10 02:05:37 | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-04-10 02:01:30 | Re: Commit fest queue |