| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Date: | 2008-04-10 02:01:30 |
| Message-ID: | 2E948A6A7FBF6EF5782A29DC@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- --On Wednesday, April 09, 2008 21:38:29 -0400 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
wrote:
> I think there is concern that trivial patches wouldn't be submitted to a
> patch tracker, especially by new submitters.
Can I see a show of hands as to who (other then Bruce) is concerned that new
submitters are too lazy to submit their patches through a proper patch tracker
vs simply sending via email?
I could see it with older submitters, who are used to just sending an email,
but the new guys will go with whatever procedure is laid out for them *as long
as* it is enforced ...
- --
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org)
Email . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org MSN . scrappy(at)hub(dot)org
Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.8 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkf9dPoACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvP3vwCg5+PG39xHUDhiDUKPcEzH8fZi
Ei4An140iNV/q/Ne/B7NpsziNDXQaIoU
=PlXR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2008-04-10 02:02:37 | Re: Commit fest queue |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2008-04-10 01:59:43 | Re: Commit fest queue |