| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql and comments |
| Date: | 1999-10-07 15:30:08 |
| Message-ID: | 37FCBC80.970E2C07@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> The question I have though is, is there a reason, besides efficiency, that
> psql doesn't just send the comment to the backend with the query? The
> backend does accept comments last time I checked. Perhaps someone will one
> day write something that makes some use of those comments on the backend
> (thus conflicting with the very definition of "comment", but maybe a
> logger) and it would remove some load out of psql.
Efficiency is all, along with (probably) the backend being unhappy
getting *only* a comment and no query.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-10-07 16:17:40 | Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-10-07 15:27:07 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |