Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date: 1999-10-07 15:27:07
Message-ID: 37FCBBCB.A4E1B486@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On a separate note, should we support HAVING without any aggregates?

Sure, it is allowed by the SQL92 spec (as are various other
combinations with and without GROUP and HAVING). But it adds no real
functionality, and this is the first report of anyone even trying it,
since the same behavior is covered by simpler, more common queries.
Doesn't seem to be a high priority...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-07 15:30:08 Re: psql and comments
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-10-07 14:57:31 Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments