| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New version number 6.6 or 7.0 |
| Date: | 1999-07-17 21:03:46 |
| Message-ID: | 3790EFB2.1D183C2A@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Can I have votes on what people want the next version number to be?
> We have to brand the release when we start development(PG_VERSION
> file). 6.5 probably should have been called 7.0, but we had already
> committed to 6.5.
We've been making pretty steady progress over the last few releases.
I'd suggest that a bump to 7.0 should happen when we've accumulated
most of the fixes/improvements from the "hot list". We've worked
through most of those; here are the ones I'd like to see at or before
a 7.0 release:
o implement outer joins
o merge date/time types and deprecate the old 4-byte ones
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 1999-07-17 21:47:21 | Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-07-17 20:54:25 | Re: [HACKERS] Merging old man pages |