From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Release date and docs |
Date: | 1999-05-27 16:03:22 |
Message-ID: | 374D6CCA.8401E477@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Are you going to generate HISTORY from (sgml) for this release? If so, I
> will skip updating that.
Yes. So, I'm going to be out of town from this evening through the
holiday weekend. And I would need a few days (4?; could shrink it a
bit by taking a day from work) to prepare postscript hardcopy for a
release.
Are we on track to release June 1? If so, I'd like to derail it by a
few days to get the hardcopy docs prepared. If not, I won't need to
take the fall for asking for a slip ;)
An alternative which I would support but am not yet as satisfied with
would be to decouple the hardcopy docs from the release package. Then
I could release the hardcopy a few days after the actual release.
This alternative has the attractive feature that I don't need to get
final updates two weeks in advance of a release to start prepping the
hardcopy. Especially since I *never* manage to get those updates from
everyone that early. html and text files like INSTALL would ship with
the first release, since those are either automatic (html) or easy (~5
minutes each for INSTALL or HISTORY).
Comments?
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-27 16:10:50 | Re: Release date and docs |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 1999-05-27 15:08:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |