Re: vacuum row?

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum row?
Date: 2006-06-26 14:04:02
Message-ID: 36e682920606260704k695c17c4nc183089706173cf6@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/26/06, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com> wrote:
> Is it really nessisary make personal comments like this? Lets discuss
> "ideas" not personalities or people.

Chill dude :) All I was saying is that if you look at past threads,
this is a heavily discussed and near-religious topic. Doing some
research before firing another shot across the bow wouldn't hurt. I
do like the discussion though, it's good... I was just making an
observation that it could've been brought up in a little more
constructive way as there's a good amount of detail on Firebird's MVCC
(not that it's perfect either), but it's a mature implementation sort
of similar to the method you're discussing.

Please don't take it personally... it surely wasn't meant that way.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1300
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 2nd Floor | jharris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-06-26 14:15:54 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Devrim GUNDUZ 2006-06-26 14:02:55 Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL