| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Robert Staudinger" <robert(dot)staudinger(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [SoC] Relation between project "XML improvements" and "pgxml" |
| Date: | 2006-05-03 20:23:59 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920605031323t6b51eee0kd562b7686e97a9ab@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/3/06, Robert Staudinger <robert(dot)staudinger(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> on your summer of code page [1] you outline a project "XML improvements".
> Is there any relation (similar goals, feature overlapping, technical
> relation) to the "pgxml" project mentioned for some time on [2]?
No, the XML project idea submitted did not include Oleg's stuff at all.
> now that I'm pondering the submission of a
> SoC proposal I'm wondering if the "XML improvements" project is a
> completely new approach, maybe even superceding the
> approach outlined
At this point in time, I don't believe there's any single best way to
go regarding XML-handling in PostgreSQL. If you have a neat project
idea, please propose it to us on Google's site!
--
Jonah H. Harris, Database Internals Architect
EnterpriseDB Corporation
732.331.1324
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tony Wasson | 2006-05-03 21:09:05 | Re: drop database command blocking other connections |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-03 20:15:43 | Rethinking locking for database create/drop vs connection startup |