Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions
Date: 2025-11-17 15:04:17
Message-ID: 36EE762C-E3A9-4BB3-946D-EA76EDBE9ED7@yesql.se
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 17 Nov 2025, at 15:59, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 11:30 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>>
>>> On 17 Nov 2025, at 15:08, Sugamoto Shinya <shinya34892(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> I ordered the valid encodings alphabetically and extracted those into separate parameters.
>>
>> LGTM. Per project style I don't think we should quote the names of encodings
>> since they are visibly not English words (see commit a243569bf65c5 which deals
>> with variable names, but I think it applies here as well)
>
> It looks like the message-style rule added in commit a243569bf65c5
> applies only to
> configuration parameter names, right? And it seems that rule was later revised
> by commit 17974ec2594. Is that correct?

Oh right, I had forgotten about that, thanks for the reminder. The patch as
proposed is correct then.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2025-11-17 15:06:49 Re: [PATCH] jit: fix build with LLVM-21
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2025-11-17 14:59:39 Re: [PATCH] Add hints for invalid binary encoding names in encode/decode functions