Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding...

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding...
Date: 1998-12-01 06:00:43
Message-ID: 3663860B.5F716B45@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Vadim Mikheev wrote:
>
> Why slower allocation? BufferDescriptorGetBuffer used sizeof sbufdesc
> to get buffer number in 1993. Jolly/Andrew put buffer number
> (buf_id) into sbufdesc itself and so made sbufdesc padding
> useless.

Ah. I had only read the comment without understanding the current
implementation...

- Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Constantin Teodorescu 1998-12-01 08:00:33 Two pg_dump ugly bugs :-(
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-12-01 04:26:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] cursor and update + view