Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding...

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] sbufdesc' padding...
Date: 1998-12-01 02:50:44
Message-ID: 36635984.84E60BEF@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Thomas G. Lockhart" wrote:
>
> > * ... this hack cut 10% off of the time to create the Wisconsin
> > * database! It eats up more shared memory, of course, but we're
> > * (allegedly) going to make some of these types bigger soon
> > * anyway... -pma 1/2/93
> > This is not true now:
> > #define BufferDescriptorGetBuffer(bdesc) ((bdesc)->buf_id + 1)
> > Comments ?...
>
> Does that mean that we have re-introduced the slower allocation
> technique sometime since 1993? 10% speed improvement for some operations
> seems interesting...

Why slower allocation? BufferDescriptorGetBuffer used sizeof sbufdesc
to get buffer number in 1993. Jolly/Andrew put buffer number
(buf_id) into sbufdesc itself and so made sbufdesc padding
useless.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1998-12-01 02:51:58 Re: [HACKERS] COMMIT
Previous Message Kurt Seel 1998-11-30 21:37:08 6.4 core dumping on freebsd 2.2.7