From: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)usa(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE |
Date: | 1998-11-19 03:32:54 |
Message-ID: | 36539166.A9FEAA7E@alumni.caltech.edu |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
> But wouldn't it be more useful to preprocess the query and store the
> resulting nodes instead? We don't want to parse the statement
> everytime a variable binding comes in.
Sure. Sorry I wasn't being very specific. Also, whoever implements it
gets to do it either way at first :)
btw, I'm buried in trying to get a CASE statement to work, so am not
volunteering for this one...
- Tom
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Meskes | 1998-11-19 07:52:23 | Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE |
Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-11-19 03:17:08 | Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Constantin Teodorescu | 1998-11-19 07:07:11 | Re: [INTERFACES] What is the right interface??? |
Previous Message | Samuel Kobelkowsky | 1998-11-19 00:19:08 | What is the right interface??? |