Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)usa(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Date: 1998-11-19 03:32:54
Message-ID: 36539166.A9FEAA7E@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces

> But wouldn't it be more useful to preprocess the query and store the
> resulting nodes instead? We don't want to parse the statement
> everytime a variable binding comes in.

Sure. Sorry I wasn't being very specific. Also, whoever implements it
gets to do it either way at first :)

btw, I'm buried in trying to get a CASE statement to work, so am not
volunteering for this one...

- Tom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Meskes 1998-11-19 07:52:23 Re: [HACKERS] PREPARE
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-11-19 03:17:08 Re: [HACKERS] More on 6.4 on DEC Alpha + Digital Unix 4.0d + DEC C compiler

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Constantin Teodorescu 1998-11-19 07:07:11 Re: [INTERFACES] What is the right interface???
Previous Message Samuel Kobelkowsky 1998-11-19 00:19:08 What is the right interface???