Re: DOCS: Missing <structfield> tags for some SEQUENCE fields

From: Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: DOCS: Missing <structfield> tags for some SEQUENCE fields
Date: 2025-11-13 09:22:08
Message-ID: 3648FEDF-185B-489C-B97C-6C665A5F578F@gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Nov 13, 2025, at 13:17, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reviewing the recent patches for SEQUENCE documentation I found
> [1] a few more instances where the <structfield> tag should have been
> used for some of the sequence fields (per the recent push [2]).
>
> PSA patch v1 to address these.
>
> ======
> [1] Searched all docs for 'is_called' and for 'last_value'
> [2] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/980a855c5c2e21e964a739694e24004f72e03fdf
>
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia
> <v1-0001-Fix-more-structfield-tags.patch>

Good catch. LGTM. I rendered the html pages and viewed them, the pages also look good.

Best regards,
--
Chao Li (Evan)
HighGo Software Co., Ltd.
https://www.highgo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Quan Zongliang 2025-11-13 09:36:19 Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_database_ddl() function to reconstruct CREATE DATABASE statement
Previous Message Yugo Nagata 2025-11-13 09:16:04 Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench