Re: [HACKERS] Last call?

From: "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, tih(at)hamartun(dot)priv(dot)no, rkirkpat(at)nag(dot)cs(dot)colorado(dot)edu, martin(at)biochemistry(dot)ucl(dot)ac(dot)uk, t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp, Keith Parks <emkxp01(at)mtcc(dot)demon(dot)co(dot)uk>, szybist(at)boxhill(dot)com, dlw(at)seavme(dot)xroads(dot)com, pjlobo(at)euitt(dot)upm(dot)es, Bill(dot)Allie(at)mug(dot)org, horak(at)mmp(dot)plzen-city(dot)cz, jsturm(at)zenacomp(dot)com
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last call?
Date: 1998-10-26 15:12:40
Message-ID: 36349168.E10B1E8C@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I still need reports on:

> _ AIX 4.1.x-4.2
> _ FreeBSD 2.2.x-3.x
> _ NetBSD 1.3 NS32532
> _ NetBSD 1.3 Sparc
> _ NetBSD 1.3 VAX
> _ DGUX 5.4R4.11 (m88k or ? we need a new maintainer)
> _ IRIX 6.x (Andrew, are you available?)
> _ Digital 4.0
> _ linux 2.0.x Alpha
> _ SCO (Billy, can you confirm success now?)
> _ Solaris x86
> _ Solaris 2.5.1-2.6 Sparc
> _ SunOS 4.1.4 Sparc
> _ SVR4 4.4 m88k (I have v6.3 "confirmed with patching". better now?)
> x Windows NT

Tatsuo, is your usual stable of machines available for reporting? It
would be nice to get confirmation with that big-endian/little-endian
mix.

How should I list WindowsNT? I have "mostly working, check web site for
patches" at the moment, but I don't know if we have more info available
now.

I would welcome confirming reports on other platforms too.

- Tom

In response to

  • Last call? at 1998-10-25 04:29:38 from Thomas G. Lockhart

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Horak Daniel 1998-10-26 15:35:39 RE: [HACKERS] Last call?
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-10-26 14:55:44 Re: [HACKERS] How do we find serial types